blank
blank blank blank
blank
National Electrical Code
Power Quality
Construction
Ops & Maintenance
Market Trends
V/D/V and Security
Product Depot
blank


Top 40 Design Firms
Top 50 Contractors
Product of the Year
100 Years of EC&M

CodeWatch
ElectricalZone
PQNewsBeat

EC&M
CEE News Archives
Power Quality Archives

Power Quality E-zine
EC&M Books
Calendar of Events
Author Guidelines
Contact Us

Electrical Wholesaling
Electrical Marketing
blank

Ask the Experts

 By Mike Lowenstein, Harmonics Limited

Electrical Construction & Maintenance, Dec 1, 2003

Print-friendly format E-mail this information

cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0>
cellpadding=>

Understanding the meaning of total effective current or voltage can be tricky. This month Mike Lowenstein, president of Harmonics Limited, helps us set the record straight on these oft misunderstood topics.

Q. When a power meter or instrument is indicated by the manufacturer to be “true rms,” does it necessarily follow that the instrument readings will, in the case of measuring circuit current or voltage, reflect the “total effective” current or voltage in the circuit, as defined and discussed in the November 2002 PQ Corner article “Harmonic Current and Voltage Distortion”?

Lowenstein's answer: In the article you reference, the expression “total effective” as used with current or voltage relates to the calculation of power losses through a system resistance. Fig. 1 at right illustrates the measurement of voltage in a system that powers a nonlinear load. Using this system, it's easy to determine the power loss due to the voltage drop across system impedance. First calculate the power loss for the 60 Hz or fundamental current, then do the same for the rms current. You'll find the presence of harmonic currents results in increased power losses.

For example, consider the system data as shown in Fig. 2 at right. In this example, the harmonic currents increase power loss by 132W, or 12.6%. As you can see, the rms values, when used to calculate losses, give the real losses in watts, and the rms currents indicate the real load on circuit components. Any true rms meter from a reputable manufacturer should give the desired values. The total effective voltage and current values are also useful in determining loading on thermal circuit breakers.

That said, you should be aware of a few subtle differences between meters. When selecting a meter to be used for measuring current or voltage in a system that serves loads with switched-mode power supplies, the largest crest factor, or the ratio of peak to rms values, that the meter can be exposed to and still read correctly will determine whether the true rms value actually captures all the harmonics. Some inexpensive meters state they can handle crest factors of 2 or 2.5. Since the crest factor of computer power supplies is usually between 3.5 and 4, this type of meter won't provide readings that represent the true rms value.

In general, if you select a true rms meter from a reputable manufacturer and make sure that the meter can handle high enough crest factors, you can feel confident that, for power calculations and loading values, the meter will show you the “total effective” current or voltage.



© 2008, Primedia Business Magazines and Media, a PRIMEDIA company. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of PRIMEDIA Business Corp.

Get Copyright Clearance Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008, PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media Inc.

Print-friendly format E-mail this information



Current Issue

blank

blank
blank blank blank blank
blank blank Online Poll blank
blank blank blank blank
blank
blank blank blank blank
blank blank
  The NEC is steadily expanding to include more communications wiring requirements. With the increasing number of low-voltage wiring installations, how should the NFPA and NEC respond?
  Continue to expand the Code as new requirements are needed
  Communications system requirements have outgrown the NEC
  Stop expanding the Code, it's already too big
   
  View Results 
blank
blank

blank
blank